|
Notice how OBVIOUS
the space is between the joists and the beams, repeated 22 times along
an out-in-the-open 38-foot beam! Yet, the deathtrap was never revealed
to buyers in at least a dozen condo sales from the late eighties to the late
nineties when it was fortunately discovered.
A dozen individual sales in this 8-unit building means a dozen
structural inspections! In addition
to the inspectors, there were appraisers and real estate agents. Every
one of these professionals failed to see (or at least to report)
the apparent grave risk to at least a dozen families!
The buyers didn't even look because they trusted the pro's...
Those kind of numbers, involving several non-associated firms and
individuals, mean there is far more wrong here than the isolated incompetence
or negligence of a few. The problem here is institutional -- and the
responsible institution is both nationwide and oppressively dominant within virtually
every locality! The fundamental element of that
institution is the real estate listing firm! Listing firms (representing
the sellers who "list" their property with them)
literally encompass about 98% of all real estate agents.
There is actually "good" in this -- a valuable lesson and remedy for those
who are about to buy real estate. Not one of these condo buyers bought with the
help of a buyer's agent! "Their" inspectors were
hired by sellers' agents who would not collect a commission if
the deal fell through.
Inspectors, appraisers, and even lenders who honestly expose
"unattractive" facts about value or property traits
get labelled as "deal breakers" and have good reason
to fear consequent boycott. Recently (1999), DATELINE-NBC did
an expose on inspectors under the thumb of listing agents.
The problem is so severe that as of this writing (2/19/01)
more than 4,500 appraisers have signed a
petition to Federal authority for relief
from lenders, real estate agents and others who exert pressure
to force them to "inflate values" and "ignore
deficiencies."
True buyers' agents usually cost the buyers no additional commission,
and because they move on with the buyer until the right
property is found, do not lose a fee because a specific property is
not bought. Thus, they have no reason to try to force sales that are
not in the buyer's interest! Only they can be
counted upon to seek and support inspectors and appraisers who will
not cover up deficiencies. They themselves routinely look for such
things on behalf of their buyer clients.
If the traditional system here motivated so many sellerside professionals to so consistently ignore buyers' interests even in this highly critical matter of their actual safety, then how can they be trusted to serve buyer interests in any matters at all? Buyers need to use buyers' agents who are both trained, motivated, and rewarded to make OR break deals exclusively in accordance with the buyer's interests.There is still a problem, as indicated by the frequent use of quotation marks here around the word "agent." Many licensees are no more honest about themselves as "agents" than about property value and fitness. The independently written book, BOUGHT, NOT SOLD spells out why only "Exclusive Buyers' Agents" (EBAs) (and the extremely rare "single agent") are true buyers' agents. An EBA is someone who works only for buyers and is in an office that works only for buyers, i.e., an "Exclusive Buyers' Office" (EBO). (A "single agent" in a tiny -- usually one-person -- office might work for buyers and sellers, but either not at the same time, or only after determining they are not in the same market.)
Both buyers and sellers can use the historically established
and well-documented definition of "Exclusive Buyers'
Agent" (and of "Exclusive Sellers' Agent")
to take a measure of the integrity of any "experienced"
professional. Every consumer should use extreme
caution in dealing with those who twist the
definition to their own interests. The truth:
Most outrageously, a number of state legislatures have cooperated
with well-financed real estate lobbies in creating bizarre loopholes
in the law of agency (predicted in BOUGHT, NOT SOLD). In the
most blatant example, these agency
masqueraders are given a new costume called "designated
agency." There, one licensee becomes an alleged "buyer's
agent" and another a "seller's agent" in the
same transaction because the firm's manager says so (designates them).
The good news is that even in states where legislators have been duped
into giving legal license to misrepresent, consumers NEVER
have to agree to less than full agency. Neither buyers nor sellers
get full agency from such "agents." At the least,
they should refuse to agree to pay full agency
commissions to anyone not providing full agency
service, i.e., to anyone other than a true Exclusive Buyer's Agent (EBA),
true Exclusive Sellers' Agent (ESA), or true Single Agent.
Still, some have the gall to call themselves "exclusive buyers'
agents" because they deal only with buyers in a listing office
(obligated to sellers)! Others even more absurdly make the claim based
on the agreement of the buyer to not use other agents.
It is not simply about buyers'
agents, nor is it written just for buyers. It is about agency
and how it is necessary for both buyers and sellers in the real
estate marketplace. The book establishes that sellers are served
no better than buyers in the current system. EBA's are rare.
ESA's are almost non-existent!
What buyers and sellers need to do is walk into the real estate market with
their eyes wide open. The book,
BOUGHT, NOT SOLD was written by a legitimately credentialed
and independent social researcher. The endorsers on its cover include a former state
Attorney General, the head of a national consumer organization, and the former Federal Trade
Commission investigator whose 1983 FTC report of wholesale real estate industry misrepresentation launched the whole international buyer agency movement. Since Bought Not Sold's publication,
writers, editors, and practitioners have publically acclaimed the work.
BOUGHT, NOT SOLD PROVIDES THE MEANS TO KNOW!